RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
Abstract
Professor Thompson responds to Valverde's argument, in the last issue, that his approach to Risk puts too much emphasis on the distinction between Risk subjectivism and Risk objectivism. In doing so, he asserts, inter alia, that anchoring Risk judgments in a probabilistic framework does not go far enough in rejecting reigning Risk-analysis notions of "real Risk."
Repository Citation
Paul B. Thompson, Reply to Valverde, 3 RISK 49 (1992).
Included in
Cognition and Perception Commons, Other Statistics and Probability Commons, Philosophy Commons, Risk Analysis Commons