Date of Award
Winter 2014
Project Type
Thesis
Program or Major
Political Science
Degree Name
Master of Arts
First Advisor
Dante J. Scala
Second Advisor
Andrew E. Smith
Third Advisor
Daniel Bromberg
Abstract
Independent expenditure-only committees, known as super PACs, have emerged as substantial actors in the electoral arena. They have surpassed every other type of campaign organization in the 2012 election, including political parties, and have become an appealing alternative to traditional political action committees due to their limited restrictions. This study explores the characteristics of the races in which super PACs participated, which allows the researcher to examine the various motives of these new organizations. An analysis of the 2012 congressional election cycle found that super PACs are sensitive to race competitiveness, suggesting they are interested in seat maximization, but not as a primary motivation as it is for political parties. Rather, they follow ideological motives, moving to elect like-minded candidates. Unlike some traditional political action committees, super PACs were not shown to pursue investment motives, where organizations trade campaign resources for the expectation of future reward. We conclude that super PACs are not emerging as substitutes for the party system and are not bound to the same strategic restrictions that define the allocation tactics of parties and political action committees.
Recommended Citation
Pretorius, Christina Marie, "Resource Allocation of Super PACs: An Analysis Of The 2012 Congressional Election Cycle" (2014). Master's Theses and Capstones. 908.
https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/908