Abstract
Wildfire poses a rising threat in the western USA, fueled by synergies between historical fire suppression, changing land use, insects and disease, and shifts toward a drier, warmer climate. The rugged landscapes of northeast Oregon, with their historically forest- and resource-based economies, have been one of the areas affected. A 2011 survey found area residents highly concerned about fire and insect threats, but not about climate change. In 2014 we conducted a second survey that, to explore this apparent disconnect, included questions about past and future summertime (fire season) temperatures. Although regional temperatures have warmed in recent decades at twice the global rate, accompanied by increasing dryness and fire risks, the warming itself is recognized by only 40 % of our respondents. Awareness of recent warming proves unrelated to individual characteristics that might indicate experience on the land: old-timer versus newcomer status, year-round versus seasonal residence, and ownership of forested land. Perceptions of past warming and expectations of future warming are more common among younger respondents and less common among Tea Party supporters. The best-educated partisans stand farthest apart. Perceptions about local temperatures that are important for adaptation planning thus follow ideological patterns similar to beliefs about global climate change.
Department
Sociology; New Hampshire EPSCoR
Publication Date
8-1-2016
Journal Title
Regional Environmental Change
Publisher
Springer
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Document Type
Article
Recommended Citation
Hamilton, L.C., J. Hartter, B.D. Keim, A.E. Boag, M.W. Palace, F.R. Stevens & M.J. Ducey.2016. “Wildfire, climate, and perceptions in northeast Oregon.” Regional Environmental Change16:1819–1832. doi: 10.1007/s10113-015-0914-y
Rights
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Comments
This is an Accepted Manuscript. The final publication is available at Springer via https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0914-y