Abstract
Abstract
Simulations from our newly expanded ring current-atmosphere interactions model with self-consistent magnetic field (RAM-SCB), now valid out to 9 R E, are compared for the first time with Van Allen Probes observations. The expanded model reproduces the storm time ring current buildup due to the increased convection and inflow of plasma from the magnetotail. It matches Magnetic Electron Ion Spectrometer (MagEIS) observations of the trapped high-energy (>50 keV) ion flux; however, it underestimates the low-energy (<10 keV) Helium, Oxygen, Proton, and Electron (HOPE) observations. The dispersed injections of ring current ions observed with the Energetic particle, Composition, and Thermal plasma (ECT) suite at high (>20 keV) energy are better reproduced using a high-resolution convection model. In agreement with Electric and Magnetic Field Instrument Suite and Integrated Science (EMFISIS) observations, RAM-SCB indicates that the large-scale magnetic field is depressed as close as ∼4.5 RE during even a moderate storm. Regions of electromagnetic ion cyclotron instability are predicted on the duskside from ∼6 to ∼9 RE, indicating that previous studies confined to geosynchronous orbit may have underestimated their scattering effect on the energetic particles. Key Points Expanded RAM-SCB model reproduces well high-energy (>50 keV) MagEIS observations The magnetic field is depressed as close as ∼4.5 RE during even a moderate storm EMIC wave growth extends on duskside from ∼6 to ∼9 RE during storm main phase.
Department
Physics
Publication Date
4-2014
Journal Title
Geophysical Research Letters
Publisher
American Geophysical Union Publications
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.1002/2014GL059533
Document Type
Article
Recommended Citation
Jordanova, V. K., Y. Yu, J. T. Niehof, R. M. Skoug, G. D. Reeves, C. A. Kletzing, J. F. Fennell, and H. E. Spence (2014), Simulations of inner magne-tosphere dynamics with an expanded RAM-SCB model and comparisons with Van Allen Probes observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 2687–2694, doi:10.1002/2014GL059533
Rights
©2014. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.