Comparison of Hossfeld's method and two modern methods for volume estimation of standing trees.
Abstract
Abstract
Two modern methods, centroid sampling and the paracone model, have been shown to be accurate approaches for obtaining the volumes of trees and logs when taper functions are unavailable or local volume estimates are desired. We show that the equation for whole-tree volume using Hossfeld's method, an older method that has all but disappeared from the North American literature, is nearly identical to that for centroid sampling and the paracone model. Hossfeld's method may be slightly simpler to implement in the field, and like the modern methods, it can be used either for whole trees or for unmerchantable tops. In comparison with detailed measurements taken on 186 ponderosa pine trees from the Black Hills of South Dakota, the paracone model was most accurate for whole trees, but Hossfeld's method was slightly more accurate than centroid sampling. Hossfeld's method was substantially more accurate than either modern method for estimating the volume in tops.
Department
Natural Resources and the Environment
Publication Date
1-2011
Journal Title
Western Journal of Applied Forestry
Publisher
Society of American Foresters
Document Type
Article
Recommended Citation
Ducey, M.J., Williams, M.S. Comparison of Hossfeld's method and two modern methods for volume estimation of standing trees. (2011) Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 26 (1), pp. 19-23.
Rights
Copyright © 2011 by the Society of American Foresters.