Abstract

This brief Foreword explains that First Amendment law is fertile ground for analysis under choice of law principles. It then opines that the majority and dissenting opinions in Sorrell v. IMS Health are rooted in different choices of law that would benefit from a more explicit acknowledgment and explanation.

Publication Date

1-1-2012

Journal Title

Vermont Law Review

Document Type

Article

Additional Information

Abstract available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2131757

Share

COinS