https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/694906">
 

Abstract

Scaling aquatic ecosystem processes like nutrient removal is critical for assessing the importance of streams and rivers to watershed nutrient export. We used pulse NH4+ enrichment experiments and measured net NH4+ uptake in 7 streams throughout a mountainous tropical river network in Puerto Rico to assess spatial variability in NH4+ uptake and to infer the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics that most influence its variation. Across 14 experiments, NH4+ uptake velocity (vf) ranged from 0.3 to 8.5 (mean = 2.7) mm/min and was positively related to algal biomass standing stock, measured as chlorophyll a. On average, 49% of experimentally added NH4+ was immediately transformed to NO3−, suggesting that nitrification can rival microbial and algal assimilation as a fate of streamwater NH4+. We considered the implications of our empirical results at the river-network scale based on a simple mass-balance model parameterized for the Río Mameyes watershed. Most catchment NH4+ inputs are delivered to 1st-order streams. Therefore, model results indicated that high NH4+ uptake rates in headwater streams limit NH4+ inputs to downstream reaches, thereby decreasing the role of larger streams in NH4+ removal at the river-network scale. In-stream nitrification resulted in additional NO3− inputs, which were more likely than NH4+ to be transported downstream because of lower biological demand for NO3− relative to NH4+. Given our estimates of catchment N loading to streams and rivers, we estimated that 39% of modeled watershed NO3− export was produced within the river network by nitrification. Together, these results suggest that streams and rivers can significantly transform the N load from their catchments.

Department

Earth Systems Research Center

Publication Date

10-10-2017

Journal Title

Freshwater Science

Publisher

University of Chicago Press

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/694906

Document Type

Article

Rights

© 2017 by The Society for Freshwater Science.

Comments

This is an article published by University of Chicago Press in Freshwater Science in 2017, available online: https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/694906

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.