https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15023-2021">
 

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors

Charles A. Brock, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Karl Froyd, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory
Maximilian Dollner, University of Vienna
Christina J. Williamson, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Gregory Schill, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Daniel M. Murphy, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Nicholas L. Wagner, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Agnieszka Kupc, University of Vienna
Jose L. Jimenez, University of Colorado
Pedro Campuzano-Jost, University of Colorado
Benjamin A. Nault, University of Colorado
Jason C. Schroder, University of Colorado
Douglas A. Day, University of Colorado
Derek J. Price, University of Colorado
Bernadett Weinzierl, University of Vienna
Joshua P. Schwarz, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Joseph M. Katich, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Siyuan Wang, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Linghan H. Zeng, Georgia Institute of Technology
Rodney Weber, Georgia Institute of Technology
Jack E. Dibb, University of New HampshireFollow
Eric Scheuer, University of New Hampshire
Glenn S. Diskin, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Joshua P. DiGangi, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
ThaoPaul Bui, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Jonathan M. Dean-Day, Bay Area Environment Research Institute
Chelsea R. Thompson, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jeff Peischl, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Thomas B. Ryerson, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Ilann Bourgeois, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Bruce C. Daube, Harvard University
Roisin Commane, Harvard University
Steven C. Wofsy, Harvard University

Abstract

In situ measurements of aerosol microphysical, chemical, and optical properties were made during global-scale flights from 2016–2018 as part of the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom). The NASA DC-8 aircraft flew from ∼ 84∘ N to ∼ 86∘ S latitude over the Pacific, Atlantic, Arctic, and Southern oceans while profiling nearly continuously between altitudes of ∼ 160 m and ∼ 12 km. These global circuits were made once each season. Particle size distributions measured in the aircraft cabin at dry conditions and with an underwing probe at ambient conditions were combined with bulk and single-particle composition observations and measurements of water vapor, pressure, and temperature to estimate aerosol hygroscopicity and hygroscopic growth factors and calculate size distributions at ambient relative humidity. These reconstructed, composition-resolved ambient size distributions were used to estimate intensive and extensive aerosol properties, including single-scatter albedo, the asymmetry parameter, extinction, absorption, Ångström exponents, and aerosol optical depth (AOD) at several wavelengths, as well as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations at fixed supersaturations and lognormal fits to four modes. Dry extinction and absorption were compared with direct in situ measurements, and AOD derived from the extinction profiles was compared with remotely sensed AOD measurements from the ground-based Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET); this comparison showed no substantial bias.

The purpose of this work is to describe the methodology by which ambient aerosol properties are estimated from the in situ measurements, provide statistical descriptions of the aerosol characteristics of different remote air mass types, examine the contributions to AOD from different aerosol types in different air masses, and provide an entry point to the ATom aerosol database. The contributions of different aerosol types (dust, sea salt, biomass burning, etc.) to AOD generally align with expectations based on location of the profiles relative to continental sources of aerosols, with sea salt and aerosol water dominating the column extinction in most remote environments and dust and biomass burning (BB) particles contributing substantially to AOD, especially downwind of the African continent. Contributions of dust and BB aerosols to AOD were also significant in the free troposphere over the North Pacific.

Comparisons of lognormally fitted size distribution parameters to values in the Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds (OPAC) database commonly used in global models show significant differences in the mean diameters and standard deviations for accumulation-mode particles and coarse-mode dust. In contrast, comparisons of lognormal parameters derived from the ATom data with previously published shipborne measurements in the remote marine boundary layer show general agreement.

The dataset resulting from this work can be used to improve global-scale representation of climate-relevant aerosol properties in remote air masses through comparison with output from global models and assumptions used in retrievals of aerosol properties from both ground-based and satellite remote sensing.

Department

Earth Systems Research Center

Publication Date

10-8-2021

Journal Title

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Publisher

EGU

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15023-2021

Document Type

Article

Comments

This is an open access article published by EGU in 2021 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, available online: https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15023-2021

Share

COinS