Lidar-Derived National Shoreline: Empirical and Stochastic Uncertainty Analyses
Abstract
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) National Geodetic Survey (NGS) is mandated to map the national shoreline, which is depicted on NOAA nautical charts, serves as an important source in determining territorial limits, and is widely used in various coastal science and management applications. The National Geodetic Survey's primary method of mapping the national shoreline is through stereo compilation from tide-coordinated aerial photography. However, over the past decade, NGS has conducted several phases of research to develop, test, and refine light detection and ranging (LIDAR)–based shoreline mapping procedures. Although important, reliable estimates of uncertainty of these products have, unfortunately, lagged behind in development. We attempt here to outline possible solutions to this lack. Specifically, this study presents and compares two new methods of assessing the uncertainty of NGS' LIDAR-derived shoreline: an empirical (ground-based) approach and a stochastic (Monte Carlo) approach. We observe uncertainties in the horizontal position of the shorelines on the order of 1 to 6 m (95%) depending on location and, especially, beach slope. We show that appropriate adjustment for biases can reduce these to about 1 m (95%) and that the two methods of assessing the uncertainty show good agreement in our test cases.
Department
Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping
Publication Date
Spring 2011
Volume
62
Journal Title
Journal of Coastal Research
Pages
62-74
Publisher Place
West Palm Beach, FL, USA
Rights
©2015 Coastal Education and Research Foundation, Inc.
Publisher
Coastal Education and Research Foundation
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.2112/SI_62_7
Document Type
Journal Article
Recommended Citation
Stephen A. White, Christopher E. Parrish, Brian R. Calder, Shachak Pe'eri, and Yuri Rzhanov (2011) LIDAR-Derived National Shoreline: Empirical and Stochastic Uncertainty Analyses. Journal of Coastal Research: Special Issue 62: pp. 62 – 74.