Identification of Child Maltreatment With the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales: Development and Psychometric Data for a National Sample of American Parents.

Authors

Murray A. Straus, University of New Hampshire - Main Campus
Sherry L. Hamby, Behavioral Health, San Carlos Apache TribeFollow
David Finkelhor, University of New Hampshire - Main CampusFollow
David W. Moore, The Gallup OrganizationFollow
Desmond Runyan, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Abstract

Abstract

Objective: To create a parent-to-child version of the Conflict Tactics Scales, the CTSPC.

Method: Description of the conceptual and methodological approaches used and psychometric data for a nationally representative sample of 1,000 U.S. children.

Results: (1) Improved Psychological Aggression and Physical Assault scales. (2) New Nonviolent Discipline scale, supplementary scale for Neglect, and supplemental questions on discipline methods and sexual abuse. (3) Reliability ranges from low to moderate. (4) Evidence of discriminant and construct validity.

Conclusions: The CTSPC is better suited to measuring child maltreatment than the original CTS. It is brief (6 to 8 minutes for the core scales) and therefore practical for epidemiological research on child maltreatment and for clinical screening. Methodological issues inherent in parent self-report measures of child maltreatment are discussed.

Department

Sociology

Publication Date

4-1998

Journal Title

Child Abuse and Neglect

Publisher

Elsevier

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1016/S0145-2134(97)00174-9

Document Type

Commentary

Recommended Citation

Straus, M.A., Hamby, S.L., Finkelhor, D., Moore, D.W., Runyan, D. Identification of child maltreatment with the parent-child Conflict Tactics Scales: Development and psychometric data for a national sample of American parents. (1998) Child Abuse and Neglect, 22 (4), pp. 249-270.