Legal Scholarship
 

Abstract

This Article examines the compatibility of the Bowl Championship Series (“BCS”) with federal antitrust law and the appropriateness of the federal government using its formal and informal powers to encourage a new format for postseason college football. The Article begins by examining the legality of the BCS under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. It then discusses the appropriateness of government actors concerning themselves with, and expending taxpayer dollars on, the scheduling of college football games. The Article concludes by offering possible changes to the scheduling structure of postseason college football, with an emphasis on voluntary, efficiency-promoting changes by the colleges, universities, and conferences currently associated with the BCS.

Publication Date

1-1-2011

Journal Title

Boston College Law Review

Document Type

Article

Additional Information

Abstract available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1711244

Share

COinS