Abstract
In this paper I make the case for a theory of accountability. Moreover, I will make the case for an ethical theory of accountability, one that centers our subject in human relationships rather than mechanisms and institutions. The foundation for this effort involves adapting a “second-personal standpoint” elaborated by moral theorist Stephen Darwall, with specific attention to the role of blameworthiness and trustworthiness is establishing an aspirational standard that informs efforts to enhance accountable governance. I contend that efforts to improve or enhance the quality (and integrity) of governance arrangements are driven by a collective ambition to achieve moral accountability in the Darwallian sense.
Department
Political Science
Publication Date
9-13-2013
Recommended Citation
Dubnick, Melvin J. ” Blameworthiness, Trustworthiness, and the Second-Personal Standpoint: Foundations for an Ethical Theory of Accountability “*. Prepared for presentation at the 2013 EGPA Annual Conference, Group VII: Quality and Integrity of Governance, Edinburgh, Scotland, 11-13 September 2013.