RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002)
Introduction
This issue includes papers presented at the conference Which Scientist Do You Believe? Process Alternatives in Technological Controversies., held at the University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center) in Concord, NH on October 6, 1994.
Cover and Front Matter, Volume Six, Number Two, Spring 1995
RISK Editorial Board
Table of Contents Volume Six, Number Two, Spring 1995
RISK Editorial Board
RAPA and Risk
Dalton G. Paxman, Kristin S. Shrader-Frechette, and Thomas G. Field Jr.
Which Scientist Do You Believe - Process Alternatives in Technological Controversies
Thomas G. Field Jr.
The Separation of Facts and Values
Arthur Kantrowitz
Coping with Phantom Risks in the Courts
Peter W. Huber
Evaluating the Expertise of Experts
Kristin S. Shrader-Frechette
Resolving Technological Controversies in Regulatory Agencies
Sidney A. Shapiro
Resolving Medical Controversies
Itzhak Jacoby
Alternative Dispute Resolution in Patent Controversies
Norman L. Balmer
The Regulatory Reform Recommendations of the National Performance Review
Jeffrey S. Lubbers
Congressional Risk Proposals
Dalton G. Paxman
Program - Which Scientist Do You Believe - Process Alternatives in Technological Controversies
RISK Editorial Board